Phoenix council approves short-term U.S. Army training on city property after debate on notice and scope

Phoenix City Council · January 7, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After several council members raised concerns about timing, transparency and neighborhood notices, Phoenix City Council approved a 3-year authorization for short-term U.S. Army training on city property by a 6–1 vote with conditions for notification and termination language discussed.

Phoenix City Council voted 6–1 on Jan. 6 to authorize short-term licenses and agreements allowing the U.S. Army to use certain city-owned properties for training exercises, after an extended discussion about public notice, oversight and the scope of activities.

Councilwoman (identified in the transcript as) Hernandez opposed the item, citing national incidents and expressing deep concern about federal enforcement activity operating in city neighborhoods. Hernandez said, "Under no circumstances should we collaborate with this government and its armed forces. We cannot make space for them to use our facilities and property," and cast the lone no vote.

Police and public-safety staff told the council the request was initiated by the U.S. Army, characterized the planned exercises as "low-visibility" training and said there was no indication the activity would be used for immigration enforcement. A police representative said the department would assign a liaison to the military branch during the multi-day exercise and would coordinate public messaging, but that operational details would remain limited for training security.

Council members pressed for clarity on several points: which federal units would participate, whether the National Guard or ICE would be involved (staff said they were not told of immigration-enforcement use), whether neighborhoods would get advance notice, and whether contracts would include termination-for-convenience language. Legal staff said most city contracts contain termination provisions and staff indicated the city retains the ability to deny or recommend alternate locations if a requested site is not appropriate for the exercise.

What happened: The council approved the authorization with council members emphasizing the need for neighborhood notification, a liaison between the city and the military branch during exercises, and the possibility of termination or relocation if activities proved inconsistent with community needs.

What's next: City staff said they will work on notification practices for impacted neighborhoods and will provide council members with additional information about site selection and termination mechanics if requested.