Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Morrow County to tighten take‑home vehicle policy after IRS guidance review

January 09, 2026 | Morrow County, Oregon


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Morrow County to tighten take‑home vehicle policy after IRS guidance review
Morrow County commissioners on an in‑person work session reviewed how the county accounts for employees who take county vehicles home and asked staff to draft clearer policy language after outside counsel called the application of IRS rules “complex.”

Bob Blackmore, contracted legal counsel with Novo Legal Solutions, told the board the county’s current travel policy “is compliant with the law” but warned that applying IRS commuting and valuation rules to individual employees is complicated. “Just consider that anytime you give a car to a county employee for commuting... that is a taxable fringe benefit,” Blackmore said, emphasizing the need for decision trees and clearer reporting guidance so payroll can account for taxable benefits properly.

Commissioners and staff discussed which positions should be listed explicitly in a travel/vehicle policy. County staff said existing language names traditional law‑enforcement roles and a few public‑works positions but that other employees (foremen, emergency managers and some probation/parole staff) currently take vehicles home and need clarification on whether those uses qualify as nonpersonal law‑enforcement exceptions or should be treated as taxable commuting benefits.

Representatives from the sheriff’s office reported internal checks indicate current take‑home use “meets IRS criteria.” The sheriff (speaker 6) stated, “after reviewing this, I don't see it changing at all. We're clearly following the IRS rules,” while probation/parole staff cautioned that marking some vehicles publicly would undermine officer safety and the effectiveness of home visits.

Counsel and staff flagged two distinct options for the board to consider: expand the county’s list of qualified nonpersonal‑use positions (explicitly adding probation/parole and emergency management where appropriate) or keep the list narrow and implement commuting‑valuation reporting (a taxable fringe) for other employees who take vehicles home. Staff also noted changes could trigger bargaining or notification obligations for unionized employees.

Next steps: commissioners directed staff to convene a small working group — including county staff, the sheriff’s office, and Bob Blackmore — to draft clarified travel/vehicle policy language and reporting procedures and return recommended language to the board for consideration. The board did not take a formal vote during the session.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI