Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission designates Brady & Farwell corner a historic district after contested public hearing

December 08, 2025 | Milwaukee , Milwaukee County, Wisconsin


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission designates Brady & Farwell corner a historic district after contested public hearing
The Milwaukee Historic Preservation Commission voted Dec. 8 to grant permanent historic designation to four adjoining properties at the corner of East Brady Street and North Farwell Avenue, concluding a public hearing that included both endorsements from preservation advocates and objections from the new owner.

Staff presented a research report tracing the properties' evolution from the 1870s through the early 20th century, identifying an intact Italianate house moved to the site in 1892, two paired High Victorian Gothic frame houses from 1878, and a Queen Anne brick house built in 1897. Staff recommended designation under local criteria for association with prominent local architects, representative architectural styles and a singular location on the Lower East Side.

Carl Bonham, representing the Milwaukee Preservation Alliance, told the commission the cluster's mixture of Italianate, High Victorian Gothic and Queen Anne architecture makes the corner uniquely valuable to the city's historic fabric. "We strongly support the staff's recommendation," Bonham said during public testimony.

Scott Leary, who identified himself as the new owner through F Street, opposed the nomination and said he had no immediate plans to develop the properties but feared the designation would create long‑term costs and restrictions. "I have no intention of developing; I plan to be a good steward of the real estate," Leary said, adding that the timing of the nomination—filed after his purchase—felt targeted. He asked the commission to consider owner burden and title impacts.

Commissioners and staff repeatedly framed the body's role narrowly: their responsibility is to evaluate eligibility under the historic criteria, not to weigh speculative future uses. One commissioner summarized the commission's mandate: "What we deal with is, are they or are they not eligible?" Staff noted that permanent designation carries regulatory obligations but also potential tax credits for approved rehabilitations.

After closing the public hearing, a commissioner moved to approve the designation under criteria F3 (association with persons important to the city), F5 (architectural distinction), F6 (work of notable architects) and F9 (singular location or visual feature). The motion carried with a voice vote.

The commission recorded no formal motions to delay or refer the designation; the staff will finalize the designation paperwork as the ordinance requires, and property owners retain any appeal rights available under local code.

The commission handled several other agenda items after the designation vote and adjourned later in the afternoon.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Wisconsin articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI