Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Building Inspection Commission votes to draft letter pushing back on proposed consolidation under Prop E streamlining task force
Summary
Commissioners voted unanimously to authorize the president and vice president to draft a letter and seek a meeting with the Commission Streamlining Task Force, urging retention of BIC’s decision-making powers and emphasizing the role of the Code Advisory Committee and public oversight.
The San Francisco Building Inspection Commission voted Nov. 14 to authorize its president and vice president to draft a letter to the Commission Streamlining Task Force addressing recommendations that would move many BIC decision-making functions to the Board of Appeals and render BIC advisory-only.
Commissioners and public commenters argued that consolidating appeals and policy oversight with a single Board of Appeals would dilute specialized technical review, reduce continuity provided by the Code Advisory Committee and diminish public access to departmental oversight. Juan Garcia of the Chinatown Community Development Center told commissioners the community values BIC’s role on housing and tenant issues and urged commissioners to make their voices heard.
President Alexander Tuke described the proposed changes as a risk to the commission’s unique housing-oversight role and asked the body to consider sending a letter outlining the commission’s concerns, inviting task force members to meet and clarifying the distinct functions of the Board of Appeals versus BIC oversight.
Deputy City Attorney Rob Capela advised that the commission may delegate drafting authority at a public meeting but that the final content should reflect the discussion and be publicly recorded. Commissioner Williams moved and Commissioner Lee seconded the motion to delegate drafting of a letter summarizing the points discussed; the motion carried unanimously on roll call.
The commission also discussed separately inviting task force members to explain the basis for claims that the commission’s structure invites corruption; commissioners said they would consider requesting a task force member appear at a future meeting. The motion to draft the letter does not preclude additional actions, including individual commissioners speaking during public comment at task force meetings.
Provenance: Discussion of the task force memo begins at the commission’s Item 9 presentation and includes public comments and the subsequent motion and roll-call vote authorizing the drafting of a letter.
