Committee hears feasibility study and pilot results for curbside EV charging, urges faster deployment

Land Use and Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors · December 8, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A multi-agency presentation and vendor briefing on curbside electric-vehicle charging found permitting complexity and grid interconnection are the primary barriers; the committee asked for faster progress and continued the hearing to the call of the chair for a three‑month check‑in.

The Land Use and Transportation Committee on Dec. 8 held a broad hearing on curbside electric-vehicle charging that combined findings from a feasibility study, pilot results and vendor experience.

President Rafael Mandelmann framed the hearing and said constituents want faster progress; Nicole Appenzeller (San Francisco Environment Department) summarized goals (25% of registered private vehicles electric by 2030, 100% by 2040) and noted the city’s need for a mix of public chargers including a near‑home curbside component. Appenzeller said the city’s rough target for curbside is 100 curbside chargers by 2030 and that the MTA recently secured funding to install 250 Level 2 chargers in city garages; she described the pilot, a completed feasibility study and $150,000 in Prop L funding for planning.

SFMTA planner Broderick Paolo said the feasibility analysis (consultant: Arup) found citywide opportunity but flagged permitting complexity and electrical interconnection as key constraints. He described the demonstration pilot (three approved vendors: It’s Electric, UrbanEV, Volt Post) and said the pilot is approaching its maximum of nine chargers across vendors (two sites already operational, several pending). Vendor representative Shannon (It’s Electric) described a model that uses extra building capacity rather than immediate new utility service, reported that utilization at the first sites rose from about 10% to almost 56% after adjustments, and said the vendor model runs at no cost to the city while sharing 20% of revenues with participating building owners.

Supervisors pressed agencies on speed and equity: President Mandelmann and others urged a faster timeline than the “100 chargers by 2030” goal and asked what steps would meaningfully accelerate deployment. Agencies said SFMTA will act as the front door for a new permitting pathway (TAMS leading), Public Works will manage excavation/encroachment permits, DBI will manage electrical permits, and SFPUC/PG&E will advise on grid readiness. SFMTA’s Kate Torn said the agency will be the front door and aims to have a permitting structure in place in 2026; the committee recorded a motion to continue the hearing to the call of the chair and to return in roughly three months for an update.