Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission unanimously continues 460 Valeo Street review amid outstanding enforcement case and public safety concerns
Summary
The San Francisco Planning Commission voted 6–0 to continue discretionary review for 460 Valeo Street to allow an outstanding enforcement case to be resolved. A public commenter alleged an unpermitted, unsafe roof/pool deck, cited prior enforcement notices, and urged stronger code‑enforcement penalties and placement of repeat contractors on DBI’s enhanced control list.
The San Francisco Planning Commission on Dec. 11 voted unanimously to continue consideration of a discretionary review for a project at 460 Valeo Street, giving staff time to resolve an outstanding enforcement case before the commission takes further action.
The continuance followed public comment from Jerry Drentler, who challenged the proposed indefinite continuance and said he had materials showing a 2018 notice of enforcement and photographs of an unpermitted deck. "It it shouldn't it doesn't meet the criteria for an indefinite continuance," Drentler said, and later stated that "the roof deck in the prior slide is illegal and it's unsafe." He also told commissioners there are now two notices of enforcement, one issued in 2025, and alleged that a dwelling unit had been converted into a private club.
Drentler named a developer/contractor, saying the contractor "is a frequent codefender" and urged that repeat contractors be added to the Department of Building Inspection (DBI) enhanced control list. He also referenced former building inspector Bernard Curran and said a structural engineer warned that the weight of water in the pool deck "is the equivalent of adding 2 stories to a 100 year old house." Those claims were presented as part of his request that the commission not indefinitely continue the item.
In response, the chair reported outreach to a Mr. Winslow and relayed that the continuance request was made "to allow for the enforcement case to be resolved prior to bringing it to you." Commissioner Braun moved to continue the item; Commissioner Campbell seconded. The roll-call vote recorded Commissioners Campbell, McGarry, Williams, Braun and Vice President Moore as "Aye," and the chair recorded the motion as passing unanimously 6 to 0, placing the matter on the consent calendar.
No further discussion or a separate hearing on the merits of the 460 Valeo matter took place at this meeting. The continuance means the commission will not take a final discretionary action on the project until the related enforcement proceedings have been addressed; the record does not state a deadline for resolution.
The meeting included multiple public comments urging clearer enforcement policy and stronger, standardized penalties for serious violations; the commission did not adopt new enforcement policy at this hearing and took no immediate action to change penalty amounts.
The commission’s action on Item 1 will appear on a future agenda once staff informs the commission that the enforcement matter has been resolved or otherwise advanced.
