Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs adaptive reuse rules to ease conversions and preserve historic buildings, 5–2
Summary
The commission recommended approval of an ordinance to consolidate and expand use-flexibility for historic buildings citywide, standardize eligibility, and waive some nonresidential size limits; commissioners split 5–2 over delegation of Historic Preservation Commission review and scope of permitted uses.
The San Francisco Planning Commission voted 5–2 on Oct. 23 to recommend approval of a planning-code amendment aimed at simplifying and expanding use-flexibility for historic buildings across the city.
Planning Department staff described the ordinance as part of Mayor Lurie’s Permit SF initiative. The measure would consolidate three existing use-flexibility programs into one citywide framework that applies to properties defined as historic in section 102 of the planning code: Article 10 landmarks, contributors to historic districts, Article 11 significant buildings, and properties listed on or eligible for state or national registers. Staff said the ordinance establishes a consistent approval pathway, requires review for Secretary of the Interior standards compliance, and extends certain benefits — including waivers of nonresidential use size limits outside neighborhood commercial districts and more flexibility for temporary uses.
Lisa Gluckstein, the staff presenter, provided examples (Saint Joseph’s Church, the Greg Angelo Museum, the Tenderloin Museum) and said the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) would still review projects that alter character-defining features but that many use changes would be handled through a standardized staff-managed pathway. She noted the HPC provided a unanimous positive recommendation at its recent hearing.
Several commissioners expressed support for preservation goals but debated delegation and safeguards. Commissioner Moore and Commissioner Williams said HPC should retain a stronger, regular review role; Moore said the commission’s public oversight role is important. Commissioner Braun and others emphasized safeguards retained for sensitive residential districts (RHRM, RTO, RTOM) where conditional use authorization would remain required. Commissioner Blong acknowledged concerns about precedent but supported approval given the “extraordinary” circumstances in some cases. The motion to recommend approval passed 5–2, with Commissioners Williams and Moore voting no.
Staff will return the item with final ordinance text for subsequent hearings and implementation steps; HPC consultation will continue for projects that affect historic features.
