Stockton Council adopts update to development code to align with state housing law
Loading...
Summary
The City Council adopted amendments to Title 16 of the Stockton Municipal Code to reflect state law, streamline permitting, add condominium conversion and urban lot split procedures, and expand waiver and exception authority to support housing development consistent with the 2040 General Plan.
The Stockton City Council on June 3 adopted an ordinance updating Title 16 of the municipal code, a staff-led effort the city says is intended to align local rules with recent state law and to remove barriers to housing development.
Stephanie Ocasio, director of community development, and Martha Miller of Miller Planning Associates outlined changes that city staff described as largely housing-oriented: clarifying residential density calculations and affordable-housing density bonus rounding, aligning zoning district purpose statements with the 2040 General Plan, adding residential open-space standards for multiunit development, and consolidating design standards to improve user-friendliness.
The code revisions also include new procedures for condominium conversions and urban lot splits, updated rules for accessory dwelling units (including a provision enabling separate conveyance of an ADU via condominium conversion), and amendments to standards for emergency shelters, transitional housing and mobile home parks to reflect state requirements. Staff said a larger waiver-and-exception process was added to permit greater director-level flexibility for certain dimensional standards, with additional waivers available to the planning commission.
During public comment Mary Elizabeth urged caution about expanded waiver authority, saying a 30% director-level change to standards could be significant when neighbors lack notice and opportunity to object; she also flagged late availability of planning commission documents and asked the city to expand public-notice methods beyond newspaper publication.
Ocasio told the council the amendments were recommended unanimously by the Planning Commission following a May 8 hearing and that staff found no further environmental review was required under SEQUA (as stated in the staff report). Councilmember questions focused on the waiver process and tobacco/smoke-shop language; staff said tobacco retail licensing and any moratorium-related language will come before council for direction.
The council moved, seconded and adopted the ordinance by a recorded vote of 6-0 (Councilmember Villapudua absent). The ordinance is intended to close out state grant work and to make the development code more consistent with the city's housing element and recent state statutes.
