Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stadium Repairs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves closeout amendment and pre‑construction CMAR for Tropicana Field repairs

City of St. Petersburg City Council · February 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a closeout amendment for Global Rope Access and a pre‑construction construction‑manager‑at‑risk agreement with Hennessy Construction to scope non‑roof repairs and develop GMP packages, as part of a phased recovery plan following storm damage.

City staff told council that emergency rope‑access crews have removed hazardous rooftop materials and that a two‑track plan is now underway to finish roofing and scope the interior/non‑roof repairs required to return Tropicana Field to playability. Raul Quintana of the engineering capital improvements department characterized F2 as a roughly $55,000 close‑out change order for Global Rope Access to capture additional time and effort, and F3 as a $896,000 CMAR preconstruction agreement with Hennessy to scope and price non‑roof restoration work such as cladding, PA/AV systems, ceilings and floor surfaces.

Quintana said the roof work is on a separate, accelerated track: staff hopes to return a guaranteed maximum price for the roof replacement in March, order fabrications, and begin installation in August with completion and dry‑in by November. He described weekly coordination with Major League Baseball and the Tampa Bay Rays and said MLB technical staff and Thornton Tomasetti structural engineers participate in the weekly all‑hands meetings to confirm acoustics, playability and testing requirements. Quintana also said staff will package non‑roof work into probable bid packages so the city can price and sequence repairs after the roof is dried in.

Council members pressed for clarity on the distinction between work required for the field to be ‘suitable for home games’ versus repairs to offices and nonfield components. The city attorney’s office said the use‑agreement obligation focuses on playability and home‑game requirements; office fit‑outs, while important, are not necessary for the team to play. Council unanimously approved both F2 and F3 and instructed administration to return with GMP proposals and any change‑order follow‑up details.

What changes next: staff will pursue the roof GMP and later present priced packages for remaining repairs. Councilmembers asked to be notified of any material surprises and urged transparency about which repairs are essential to honor the use‑agreement and which are discretionary.