Members of the Industrial Development Board ad hoc committee pressed for clarity on how the IDB can use its authorities to support housing and community development and urged more concrete follow‑through on the committee’s strategic planning.

An ad hoc member expressed frustration with the committee’s pace: "We ain't done nothing with it," Speaker 5 said, urging the committee to produce actionable recommendations for the full board that would link housing deals to local jobs and minority‑business opportunities.

Discussion focused on two practical constraints. First, staff and board members said Metro underwriting and internal analysis limit how the IDB can participate in bond transactions; Speaker 2 said ongoing internal evaluations must be completed and publicly reported before the board can act on specific bonding participation for housing. Second, state law sets boundaries on certain race‑based contracting incentives: a board member noted recent state legislation affected the Madison Station agreement and cautioned the board about statutory limits on race‑based requirements, while Gamble and others pointed to existing 'equal business opportunity' policies and disparity studies as support for continued minority‑business efforts.

Board members suggested concrete next steps, including presenting priorities to Metro Council, offering a planning committee presentation on IDB authorities and pursuing tighter coordination with the administration on TIFs and bond use. Gamble offered to help connect the board to the planning committee and to consider amendments if bill language limited the scope of incentives. Staff described ongoing work on bonding capacity and said additional public information will be released once internal analyses are complete.

The committee concluded with thanks to Councilmember Gamble and invited her to return for follow‑up as the council considers final action on related bills.