Citizen Portal
Sign In

Grayson supervisors keep existing casino-revenue split after Bristol asks for larger share to cover landfill costs

Grayson County Board of Supervisors · January 9, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Grayson County rejected Bristol’s request to reallocate casino proceeds; after a staff presentation of revenue figures and scenarios, the board voted to "stay the course" and retain the current 14-way split while staff will continue discussions with regional partners and state representatives.

The Grayson County Board of Supervisors declined a proposal from the city of Bristol to change how casino-generated revenue is split among participating localities, voting to keep the existing 14-way distribution.

County staff provided context about the request: Bristol sought a larger share to cover landfill-related expenses and other infrastructure needs. Staff presented revenue figures for Grayson County received from the casino-region distributions (2024: $625,000; 2025: $713,000; current-year figure cited in the meeting: $2,641,000) and outlined scenarios Bristol proposed that would reallocate receipts so Bristol would receive a larger share and other localities correspondingly less.

Staff described three model scenarios Bristol offered and explained the administrative process: any change requires majority approval among the 14 participating localities and then legislative action at the General Assembly. Several supervisors expressed concern that Bristol’s landfill and infrastructure problems predate the casino and that shifting local revenue as requested would reduce Grayson County’s expected receipts (one scenario would cut county receipts by roughly $300,000). One county official said, "My sentiment is to tell them no. That this is an agreement we had." The board voted to "stay the course" and maintain the current distribution.

Staff said they had spoken with state representatives and judged the risk of adverse state action as low for now, but the county will continue coordination with regional partners and bring any further proposals to the board before taking action.