District highlights graduation coaches' role and asks board to consider additional staffing

Norfolk School Board · January 8, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Presenters described how graduation coaches support attendance, credit recovery and dropout recovery across five high schools, cited a December-week dropout rate of about 11.83%, and asked the board to consider allocating additional coaches to high-need schools.

Miss Maury (graduation-coaching lead) told the board that graduation coaches operate at the intersection of academics, attendance and student engagement and that their work advances on-time graduation, credit recovery and dropout recovery. She said the district intentionally allocates two graduation coaches per high school (10 total) and described weekly MTSS/on-time graduation meetings in which coaches, counselors, attendance technicians and school leaders review early-warning metrics and plan interventions.

Assistant Principal Michael McCracken (who served previously as a graduation coach) emphasized that coaches do work beyond school walls, including home visits and coordination with community supports. He gave an example of a student who "the night before that test, that student slept in a car with their siblings and a parent," saying that graduating that student after wraparound support showed the qualitative value of the role.

Senior graduation coach Wesley Price described daily practice: an open-door policy for seniors; one-on-one transcript and checklist reviews; coordination of military, college and job readiness activities; and persistent outreach for students who have disengaged.

District data snapshots referenced by presenters included a weekly December dropout snapshot of 11.83% (not final until quarter close) and cohort-level attendance/discipline referral breakdowns; board members requested an addendum with counts (number of referrals, suspension counts, and percent of cohort affected) to better understand the scale behind the percentages. Presenters said school-level logs capture contacts and outcomes, but central reporting for some metrics is assembled at school level; staff committed to providing supplementary counts and clarification.

Presenters requested the board's consideration for additional graduation coaches in higher-need schools and described other supports available to students such as credit recovery options and tutoring contracts (district noted new vendor coverage after a prior contractor closed). Board members and staff discussed how graduation coaches fit into a broader multidisciplinary "care team" that includes counselors, social workers and attendance technicians and agreed that continued central support and filling existing vacancies are priorities.

The presentation closed with a list of named graduation coaches (by school) and an ask that the board review allocation during budget and staffing discussions.