Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Station19 Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Station 19 project seeks LEED goals and faces new Duke Energy limits for solar export

Durham City Council · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City project team told council the Station 19 Fire/EMS project aims for LEED Gold/Platinum and net‑zero carbon through all‑electric HVAC, geothermal and solar; recent Duke Energy rule changes could require added batteries, creating a possible additional CIP request.

Durham — Turner Townsend Heery project manager Jessica Killian and city consultants presented details on the Station 19 Fire and EMS project and answered council questions about sustainability, costs and energy supply.

Killian said the building design has pursued the city’s High Performance Building policy, targeting LEED certification (currently tracking toward Gold/Platinum), an all‑electric mechanical plan and geothermal systems. Solar PV was included in designs to meet daytime loads and to support carbon goals.

"We need about 150–175 kilowatts to run the building during daylight hours," Killian said, and the design originally planned to generate roughly twice that to export to the grid and offset nighttime loads. She added that Duke Energy recently changed interconnection/export policies, which may prevent the team from feeding surplus solar to the grid without additional measures such as battery storage.

Councilmembers praised the integration of the city’s Climate Action goals into a capital project but asked staff to track lifecycle cost savings. Killian said staff is converting energy savings to cost savings for the city and that the team is evaluating whether a battery system will be a short‑term CIP ask depending on Duke policy and final interconnection design.

No vote on the GMP amendment was taken at the presentation; council members thanked project staff for aligning the project with policy goals and asked staff to return with updated budget implications if battery backup is required.