Committee presses DOC on federal detainees, ICE and the U.S. Marshals contract
Loading...
Summary
Legislators questioned DOC interim Commissioner John Murad about federal detainees, the US Marshals contract and limits on immigration detainees; Murad said most federal detainees are USMS criminal cases, DOC has placed an internal cap for immigration detainees and the Marshals contract is terminable though lacks a hard end date.
Committee members asked detailed questions about DOC’s role housing federal detainees and immigration detainees, the department’s information-sharing with federal partners, and the contracts that govern those relationships.
Murad said DOC has a long‑standing contract to house U.S. Marshals detainees for federal criminal cases and that the “vast majority” of federal detainees under that contract are not immigration cases. He confirmed DOC has adopted an internal limit on accepting immigration detainees—"we said ... 170, no more"—and that federal partners have generally respected that limit. Murad added the Marshals contract does not include a fixed expiry date in the paperwork presented to the committee but can be mutually terminated by either side.
Committee members raised concerns about transparency and asked whether DOC receives paperwork explaining why people are in federal custody; Murad said intake records exist but he is not yet fully familiar with the specific forms and offered to supply redacted examples so the committee can evaluate what DOC receives and what can be shared without compromising privacy or operational security.
Murad reiterated that DOC’s intake and medical processes apply to people brought by ICE, state police or local police alike. He said language access tools are provided but noted the department’s ability to deliver interpretation and other technology‑dependent services would improve with better facility Wi‑Fi.
The committee requested sample redacted intake documents from federal partners and DOC, and indicated it may schedule additional testimony from those federal partners or contract administrators to clarify the operational and oversight implications of federal placements.
