Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Planning commission rejects Office Commercial reclassification in Ruskin, cites traffic and compatibility concerns

January 13, 2026 | Hillsborough County, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Planning commission rejects Office Commercial reclassification in Ruskin, cites traffic and compatibility concerns
The Hillsborough County Planning Commission on Jan. 12 found HCCPA 25‑30 (a small‑scale map amendment in Ruskin at 11th Avenue Southeast and 27th Street Southeast) inconsistent with the comprehensive plan by a 7–1 roll call vote.

Planning staff presented the ~4.7‑acre proposal to change future land use from Suburban Mixed Use (SMU‑6) to Office Commercial 20 (OC‑20). Staff flagged multiple concerns: the site sits at the end of a local unimproved right‑of‑way, transportation agency comments indicated inadequate capacity on four of five impacted roadway segments for the projected additional trips, and the site appears to contain wetlands. Staff said the higher density and building massing allowed under OC‑20 could be incompatible with the larger lot suburban and mobile‑home neighborhoods on nearby 11th Avenue SE.

Applicant Todd Pressman and a local business owner, Johnny Soap, said the parcel sits among intensive uses and submitted petitions of support. Pressman argued economic and agricultural support uses are appropriate; Soap said his trucking/storage business has operated seven years with no complaints.

Commissioners discussed the remand history from the Board of County Commissioners, road‑width/right‑of‑way questions, enforcement/costs of PD rezoning, and agency traffic comments. Commissioner Lankes moved to find the amendment inconsistent; the motion was seconded and carried on roll call: Bowden Yes; Cardenas Yes; Kona No; Kugler Yes; Linkus Yes; Lauck Yes; Seben Yes; Joseph Yes (7–1).

Next steps: the inconsistency finding remains part of the record; the applicant may revise and return, or pursue other zoning remedies at the Board of County Commissioners stage.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2026

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe