Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission debates charter specificity: director vs. manager titles and a reclamation department

January 13, 2026 | Silver Bow County, Montana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission debates charter specificity: director vs. manager titles and a reclamation department
Members of the Butte‑Silver Bow Charter Study Commission spent substantial time Jan. 12 debating how specific the charter should be about department structure and position titles.

Commissioner Lori Casey warned the group that adding department names and job titles to the charter risks micromanaging future councils: "We are starting to micromanage," she said. Several other commissioners agreed that many departments function under ordinance and boards and that leaving structure to the council preserves flexibility.

Commissioner Cindy Shaw summarized a discussion with Bill Melvin, manager of the Butte Civic Center, who indicated he expected to appoint an assistant manager and favored renaming the position to director as part of a succession plan; Shaw said there is no ordinance or charter language currently forcing that change. Commissioner Matt Stepan urged the commission not to "get out ahead of ourselves" by adding charter language unless asked to do so.

The chair framed the issue differently for some functions. She argued that the commission should memorialize a reclamation and environmental services department because Butte‑Silver Bow remains a potentially responsible party under Superfund and long‑term remediation work remains: "we have 30 more years expected," she said. Commissioners noted prior votes: the commission affirmed adding reclamation and environmental services to the charter in prior work and changed animal services' head title from manager to director in an earlier decision.

County counsel and other members clarified legal constraints: if a position or department is specified in the charter it can constrain future council authority, but the group can also place a general label in the charter and rely on ordinance for operational details. Commissioners said they will continue analysis, gather more public comment and working‑group input, and return with refined language before finalizing recommendations for the ballot.

The commission scheduled further working‑group outreach and canceled a planned Jan. 20 public meeting to give subcommittees time to complete reports; the next full commission meeting is Jan. 26.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Montana articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI