Jim Wells County commissioners spent extended time discussing abatement enforcement for illegal dumping, large debris in rights-of-way and vehicles parked in excess of 72 hours.

One commissioner argued the county should either direct the sheriff’s office to be more active or remove enforcement from the sheriff and assign a dedicated abatement officer to the commissioner's court or a constable, saying the court needs to “take action and and remove that responsibility from the sheriff's department and and assign our own, abatement officer.” A public commenter and other commissioners described recurring examples—dumpsters placed in easements, tires and brush dumped from outside the county—and urged greater proactive enforcement, public outreach, and camera monitoring.

County staff reported that in 2025 there were three criminal cases submitted and filed relating to abatement, and described a civil administrative process used by the safety office involving notices and voluntary compliance. Safety officer David Elizade described site visits and notice procedures and said the safety office issues neighborhood notices and follows up. Commissioners agreed to research staffing levels, review the effectiveness of current enforcement and pursue follow-up discussions with the sheriff and other stakeholders.