Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews $1.3M middle‑school redesign, ADA access and multiple facilities projects
Summary
District staff outlined a slate of 2026 facilities projects including a concept design for a middle‑school circle drive and staff lot (estimate ~$1.3M), an upper‑gym ADA ramp (~$140,000), Brinkman lot resurfacing (~$150,000 estimate) and other prioritized repairs, some contingent on funding.
Get email alerts on the Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jonathan presented a prioritized facilities list for 2026–27 and described which projects are already funded and which are pending additional funding. He said the high‑priority items include pool surge‑tank completion, ADA access to the high‑school upper gym balcony, a middle‑school parking redesign and resurfacing needs at Brinkman and other lots.
On the middle‑school parking concept, Jonathan said the preferred design creates a circle drive at the front of the middle school and relocates staff parking, noting police and fire had identified the site as the top safety priority. The concept estimate is roughly $1.3 million.
Jonathan described the upper‑gym balcony ADA ramp project as a design that requires additional corridor depth to meet ramp‑pitch requirements and is currently budgeted at approximately $140,000. He said the high‑school pool surge‑tank work should be completed within one to two weeks and was budgeted at roughly $170,000.
Other projects discussed included: Brinkman parking lot resurfacing (village partnership; estimate ~$150,000 pending final bids), stadium and back‑lot lighting (~$76,000), high‑school chiller noise mitigation (~$52,000 acoustical wrap), auditorium ADA seating modifications (~$150,000 tentative), vehicle replacements (~$348,000 aggregated estimate for multiple vehicles), several HVAC/boiler projects and routine district parking‑lot maintenance. Jonathan said some projects could be phased or paired depending on available funds and board direction.
Board members asked clarifying questions about parking counts, access, and safety mitigations; students in attendance offered input on safer back‑entrance access at the middle school.
No formal capital approvals were taken; staff asked for board feedback on project priorities and potential funding sources to bring formal requests in subsequent meetings.

