Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Antique Plates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee considers loosening limits on ‘antique’ plates amid big fiscal note

House Transportation Committee · January 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

HB1350 would remove language restricting antique‑vehicle plates to parades and club activities, which sponsors say is outdated and unenforceable; the fiscal office estimate that many owners would switch raised committee concern and DMV warned of highway‑fund revenue effects.

The House Transportation Committee reviewed HB1350 FN, which would modernize New Hampshire’s antique‑vehicle registration statute by striking the clause that limits antique plates to parades, club activities and similar non‑commercial uses.

Sponsor Representative Sam Farrington said clerks and owners are confused by the current statute, which dates to older law. "Right now, the clerk, if it sees that the car is older than 25, the clerk can issue the plate," Farrington said in testimony explaining friction between statutory language and practical administration. Public supporter Caleb Labby said the language is vague and results in inconsistent enforcement, asking the committee to follow other states that removed similar restrictions.

Committee members pressed the sponsor on a fiscal note that assumes a large conversion of vehicles to antique registration; Representative Miller noted the fiscal estimate was in the millions and would reduce highway‑fund revenue. Jennifer O'Leary (DMV) said antique registrations carry lower fees because they are intended for reduced road use, and that registration income supports state and local road maintenance. DMV explained pathways for titling and abandoned‑vehicle processes remain available and flagged fraud and revenue implications for broad exemption changes.

The committee did not take a vote. Sponsors and members suggested language fixes (including staged implementation and possible road‑use fee options) to address the fiscal impact while clarifying the statute’s intent and enforcement.