Teachers and community urge board not to cut high‑school physical education requirement
Loading...
Summary
At the Jan. 12 meeting dozens of teachers and community members urged the board to retain a full high‑school PE credit, warning that reducing the graduation requirement to a half credit or cutting PE staffing would hurt student health, safety and the district’s appeal to families and future educators.
Teachers and residents urged the Grand Forks School Board on Jan. 12 to preserve the district's high‑school physical education requirement after administrators listed a half‑credit PE reduction as one of several cost‑saving concepts.
Michelle Creamers, a Red River High School physical‑education teacher, said reducing required high‑school PE to a half credit would leave many students with structured movement for only one semester across four years and would erode investments from a prior Carolyn M. White grant and program infrastructure. "If we graduate students who can analyze literature, solve equations, but cannot care for their own well‑being, we have missed a critical component of education," Creamers said.
Other teachers reinforced that the proposed change would reduce course options, increase class size and risk eliminating adaptive and noncompetitive offerings that reach students who are not athletes. Mark Veriano said shrinking PE requirements makes the district look less competitive with peer districts and could depress recruitment and enrollment.
Administration clarified the intent behind the concept: reducing district graduation credits from 24 to 23 (the state minimum is 22), while allowing students to elect additional courses such as PE. Dr. Glatch said students would still be able to elect PE courses, but the board discussed that staffing and section availability are enrollment‑driven and that a reduction in required credits could translate into fewer sections if fewer students elect into them.
Board members asked for enrollment and outcome data and for historical impact analysis before making decisions that intersect with the district’s strategic goal on behavioral health and wellness. No action was taken; the item will be further discussed at the Jan. 16 retreat and in subsequent meetings.
