Lawmakers and experts warn CISA staffing gaps and urge broader talent pipelines as AI reshapes cyber operations

Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection · January 13, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members and witnesses said CISA and other agencies face significant staffing shortfalls; witnesses recommended reserve models, apprenticeships, upskilling with AI, and recruitment strategies to support both defense and any expanded offensive posture.

Several members used the hearing to highlight workforce shortfalls that threaten both defensive and offensive cyber capabilities. Ranking Member Thompson and other lawmakers said CISA has lost roughly one‑third of its workforce in the past year, and members warned that expanding offensive authorities without sufficient defenders would increase national risk.

Witnesses proposed multiple workforce measures: Emily Harding (CSIS) recommended reserve and National Guard models that allow private‑sector talent to serve part‑time; she suggested a ‘‘Teach for America’’‑style cyber program that funds training in exchange for service in underserved jurisdictions. Drew Bagley (CrowdStrike) emphasized return‑to‑work pathways and AI‑enabled upskilling to speed onboarding and expand capacity.

Panelists also discussed the role of AI: witnesses said AI increases adversary capabilities but can also act as a force multiplier for defenders—if secure AI detection and response tools are adopted and funded. Members asked for concrete policy steps and for oversight to ensure funds for offensive capabilities do not come at the expense of defense and resilience.