Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Malden superintendent outlines five‑year strategic plan priorities; committee seeks measurable metrics and equity detail
Summary
Superintendent Seppell presented an outline for a five‑year strategic plan centered on five priorities: high expectations with supports, fair access, deep partnerships, a supported workforce and fiscal sustainability. Committee members pressed for growth measures, subgroup disaggregation and clarity on metrics and community input.
Superintendent Seppell presented an outline of a five‑year strategic plan to the Malden School Committee on Jan. 12, describing five priorities—high expectations with supports for diverse needs; fair access to opportunity; deep partnerships with families and the community; a strong and supported workforce; and fiscal and operational sustainability—and a timeline for community engagement this spring.
Seppell said the plan will include potential metrics, strategies and a schedule for stakeholder input. He suggested state benchmarks and percentage of graduates meeting MassCore requirements as possible metrics, and emphasized tracking graduation and postsecondary enrollment and persistence as indicators of long‑term success. He framed many listed metrics as "potential" and said final metrics would be refined after community and committee feedback.
Committee members pressed for more detail. Miss Hordy cautioned against overreliance on MCAS and state benchmark testing as a single gauge and encouraged inclusion of other measures (for example, iReady). Mr. Piazza urged the superintendent to include growth measures and to disaggregate data for high‑needs subgroups. Members also asked how school improvement plans and site councils would align with the district priorities and how collaborative groups would be organized for each priority.
Seppell said the district will use existing structures—principals, instructional leadership teams, school instructional leadership teams and community advisory groups—to develop and refine the plan. He noted the district will engage families, school councils and advisory groups with scheduled updates to the committee on March 2, April 6 and May 4 and that a near‑final draft would be ready by late spring.
No approval was requested at the meeting; Seppell presented the outline for feedback and said he will return with refined metrics and timelines. Committee members indicated support for the approach while pressing for clear metrics, inclusion of growth indicators and continued attention to equity and outreach for early learning.
