Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals argument probes 'true threat' standard in harassment protection dispute
Summary
In EB v. JR, counsel for EB argued that repeated, escalating confrontations at a zoo (yelling, in‑face harassment, alleged chasing and a licensing complaint) created an objectively reasonable fear of physical harm; opposing counsel questioned whether the conduct met the statutory "true threat" standard.
The panel heard argument in EB v. JR, an appeal arising from a district court harassment‑protection order. EB’s counsel described repeated, escalating confrontations in and around a zoo, including persistent in‑person harassment, alleged chasing incidents on two occasions and an administrative campaign (a complaint to…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
