Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Data topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears data-trust report; members favor multistate collaborations and agency dashboards over a standalone state data center
Summary
A data trust report recommended against building a standalone state data repository and instead urged joining multistate data collaboratives (examples: Postsecondary Employment Outcomes Coalition, CoolRidge, BLS wage records). Committee members supported creating cross-department dashboards for ACCD initiatives.
The Committee on Commerce & Economic Development heard interns summarize a data trust report that advised against a standalone state-built data center and encouraged multistate collaboration as a lower-cost approach to aggregate cross-agency information.
Cabot reported that the data trust report concluded a standalone repository would be "very expensive" and currently infeasible and that recommended alternatives include joining multistate data collaboratives such as the Postsecondary Employment Outcomes Coalition, the CoolRidge initiative and the BLS wage-records program.
Committee members repeatedly asked for cross-departmental performance metrics and clearer implementation strategies for workforce and economic-development programs. ACCD and workforce officials said they are working on data dashboards to better track program outcomes and to increase transparency.
Why it matters: committee members said siloed data makes it difficult to evaluate program performance and to align workforce, housing and economic-development strategies. The recommended multistate collaborations would allow Vermont to participate in existing systems rather than build a high-cost standalone repository.
Next steps: committee staff and interns were asked to follow up on how dashboard prototypes and collaborative options would be funded and governed.
