Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lake Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local residents press state on Lake Earl management, urge county control and follow‑through
Summary
Residents told the Del Norte advisory commission they want Lake Earl management returned to local control, criticized past state and district actions for failing to maintain habitat, and cited historical litigation and fines; commissioners agreed to place a Lake Earl plan on a future agenda.
Multiple residents used the Del Norte County Fish and Game advisory meeting to press for active management of Lake Earl, arguing that past changes in management authority and inconsistent follow‑through have degraded habitat.
Commenters said the county once managed Lake Earl through a local flood control district and alleged that the shift in authority and state actions left the site unmanaged. One resident referenced prior litigation and a small penalty imposed under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1893 in litigation over earlier work at the site.
"We can write these plans, it's great, but the problem is how are you going to follow‑up? Nothing happens other than everything here on paper," a resident said, urging the commission and department to ensure active implementation rather than producing shelf‑ware.
Speakers asked whether flood control tax revenues are still being collected and whether funds remain dedicated to the district. Commissioners discussed forwarding a draft Lake Earl management plan to the county board of supervisors for consideration. The commission chair said the Lake Earl item will be placed on a future agenda so the commission can review the draft and, if appropriate, send it to the board.
Sean Freeze, representing CDFW, acknowledged the concerns and said he would check on specific technical issues raised by the public, including a broken lake‑level monitoring station, and offered to work with local stakeholders on follow‑up.
