Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Millbrae officials and residents urge pause on SFPUC Millbrae operations project; allege inadequate outreach

January 12, 2026 | San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Millbrae officials and residents urge pause on SFPUC Millbrae operations project; allege inadequate outreach
Several public commenters at the SFPUC Jan. 13 hearing pressed the commission on an item identified on budget slides as the Millbrae Operations Center Improvement Project and raised concerns about local outreach, fiscal impacts and environmental justice.

Steve Rinaldi, Vice Mayor of Millbrae, said the project appears in the CIP as a roughly $366 million undertaking and urged the commission to stop work until Millbrae has had a meaningful opportunity to review it and the oversight body BOSCA has weighed in. "This project must be halted until Millbrae is able to weigh in directly, BOSCA provides oversight, and a true win‑win outcome is established," Rinaldi said.

Anne Schneider, former Millbrae mayor and a BOSCO representative, told the commission that SFPUC property records undercount SFPUC landholdings in Millbrae and that regional public‑agency parcels that do not pay property tax amount to a significant share of land in Millbrae. Schneider also raised environmental justice concerns, including recent tree removal and a retaining wall tied to SFPUC work.

Patricia Lam, a Millbrae resident, said converting local commercial sites to an SFPUC storage and workshop would cost local jobs and reduce limited commercial land. She estimated the facility would cost "$250 million plus" and urged SFPUC to look for alternative, non‑commercial locations.

SFPUC staff responded that showing a project in the CIP does not equal approval of that specific project, and the chair and staff said commissioners can request additional materials and that project approvals occur separately from budget and CIP adoption.

Other regional commenters — including representatives of environmental groups and nearby wholesale customers — used their time to question SFPUC's planning assumptions (notably the agency's "design drought" assumptions) and warned that large alternative water supply projects could multiply costs. The commission continued the budget hearing and will hear follow‑ups at a special meeting on Jan. 23.

What the record shows: the CIP slide referenced by commenters lists a Millbrae‑related operations project with a dollar figure on the slide (commenters cited $366 million); multiple callers asked for greater transparency, BOSCA engagement, and a pause on any project approvals until local concerns are addressed. Staff clarified that capital plan inclusion is not equivalent to project authorization.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal