Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends denial for rezoning at 3710 Cedar Drive, citing neighborhood compatibility
Summary
The planning commission unanimously recommended denial of a rezoning request to low‑rise office for 3710 Cedar Drive, citing the proposal would create an isolated pocket of commercial activity in an otherwise residential area and raise traffic and buffering concerns.
MABLETON, Ga. — On Jan. 8 the Mableton City Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend denial of a rezoning request for 3710 Cedar Drive that sought to convert a single‑family property to low‑rise office (LRO).
Staff recommended denial, saying the applicant had not provided necessary variance requests in the packet for proposed reductions in landscape buffers and that the concept plan would create an island of commercial activity amid principally residential lots. Planning staff also noted the proposed driveways and parking did not meet city or county driveway standards and that variances would be required if the commission wished to approve the request.
Applicant representative Matthew Wilson said the proposed small office — a property‑management business for Jalisco Cruz — would serve local clients and align with the neighborhood activity center designation in the future land use map. Wilson said the applicant would install a 6‑foot privacy fence and plant buffer vegetation to mitigate impacts, and that the office would operate roughly 8 a.m.–6 p.m. on weekdays with limited truck activity.
Neighbors and community advocates objected. Steve Young of the Mapleton Improvement Coalition, residents Michael Pope and Terry Pope, and others told commissioners the narrow residential street, senior housing nearby and existing traffic conditions on Powder Springs Road and Cedar Drive made a commercial rezoning inappropriate. Concerns raised included potential traffic conflicts, pedestrian safety for nearby seniors and the character of the block.
Commissioner Robin Meyer moved to recommend denial, saying the rezoning conformed to the technical language of the comprehensive plan but not its intent, which calls for cohesive transitions between land use types. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Carl Valenzano and passed unanimously; the commission noted the denial recommendation will be forwarded to city council as the commission’s formal position on the application.
The commission’s recommendation preserves the property’s single‑family zoning and leaves any future change to be addressed through a fuller variance and review process if the applicant returns with additional documentation.
