Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Advisory Bodies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council seeks changes to advisory‑body rules: staff to draft alternates policy and clarify nepotism and speaking rules
Summary
Council discussed updating rules for commissions and committees, directing staff to draft language to allow alternates, disfavor family appointments but allow waivers, clarify attendance/removal procedures and revise handbook language that limits commissioner speech when appearing before council.
The Cupertino City Council reviewed a staff report and city‑attorney presentation on potential updates to advisory‑body policies, including nepotism restrictions, vacancies and alternates, attendance rules, commissioner autonomy, and distinctions between committees and commissions.
City Attorney Floyd Andrews walked council through five focal areas drawn from the staff report: expanding nepotism restrictions, whether to appoint non‑voting alternates who can fill in when members are absent (and under what conditions an alternate could be appointed permanently in an emergency), aligning attendance rules between the commissioner’s handbook and council procedures, and clarifying when commissioners may speak to council without implying they represent the entire advisory body. Councilors discussed tradeoffs: alternates could prevent meeting cancellations but could also be used tactically; strict nepotism bans could reduce recruitment pools; and automatic removals for attendance may be unfair without council discretion or excused‑absence rules.
Public commenters supported alternates to avoid cancellations and urged caution about conflicts of interest. Council informally agreed to direct staff to return with draft language for alternates (how they’re appointed, training and Form 700 filing, voting mechanics, and emergency appointment triggers), to draft language that makes multiple family members serving on advisory bodies disfavored but waivable by council, and to revise the handbook language that currently restricts commissioners from speaking to council in their ‘official capacity’ so that commissioners may speak but should clearly disclaim whether they are speaking for the commission or as individuals.
Next steps: city attorney and staff will draft alternates policy language, reconcile commissioner handbook and council procedures on attendance/removal, prepare an information memo on the city’s roster of internal interagency/working groups, and provide a recommended approach to nepotism restrictions and disclosure wording for commissioner statements to council.
