Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get AI Briefings, Transcripts & Alerts on Local & National Government Meetings — Forever.

Board initiates ballot process for mosquito district assessment after Aedes aegypti detections

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following detection of Aedes aegypti and a projected $2.77 million shortfall, the board authorized initiating the 2026 Mosquito and Vector Control District benefit assessment ballot process; staff proposed a $15.75/year rate for single‑family homes and said the assessment would stabilize district finances through about 2045.

Santa Clara County supervisors on Jan. 13 authorized staff to initiate a balloting process for a 2026 benefit assessment to support the Mosquito and Vector Control District.

District staff explained the 1996 and 2005 assessments no longer keep pace with rising operational costs and that the district projects a $2,770,000 shortfall by the end of the fiscal year. Staff cited multiple detections of the invasive, day‑biting mosquito Aedes aegypti — which can transmit viruses such as Zika and dengue — as a reason to expand monitoring and control resources.

A consultant survey of 20,000 property owners conducted in April 2025 showed respondent support for proceeding, staff said. The preliminary assessment amount presented would equal $15.75 per year for a single‑family home (about $1.31 per month); staff said if voters approve, the assessment would appear on fiscal‑year 2026‑27 property tax bills and, assuming CPI increases thereafter, stabilize district finances through about 2045.

Supervisors asked clarifying questions about the difference between a benefit assessment and a tax, the ballot process, and which properties pay; staff and the county fiscal officer explained that assessments are tied to property benefit, are balloted to property owners and that district revenue is overwhelmingly assessment‑driven. The board moved to begin the ballot proceeding; the motion passed 4–0.