Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Sale topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aurora council approves sale of two city lots at 930 and 932 W. New York amid requests for more detail
Summary
Council approved sale of two city-owned lots at 930 and 932 W. New York for $30,000 each after debate over contract language, whether to impose conditions on the sale, the historical status of the lots and requests for additional documentation and sample plans; staff said the offer meets or exceeds appraisal and will return executed transfer documents as authorized by the resolution.
The Aurora City Council voted Jan. 13 to sell two city-owned parcels at 930 and 932 W. New York after a lengthy discussion over contract presentation and whether the sale should include conditions requiring timely construction or energy-efficiency features.
Corporation counsel Patrick Collins summarized the item: the city received an all-cash offer for two single‑family homes, provided proof of funds, and listed sample elevations and an offer form to show the proposed transaction. Collins said the offer is for $30,000 per lot and that the resolution authorizes the mayor (or designee), treasurer or corporation counsel to execute remaining documents to complete the transfer.
Aldermen asked why the sample contract did not list the city as the seller and requested clearer labeling where materials were illustrative. Chief Development Services Officer John Curley said the lots had been separated for sale and that some lots on the city’s divestment list had been marketed for roughly two-and-a-half years as part of a longer effort to relieve maintenance burdens.
Council members asked whether conditions could be added to ensure the buyer builds within a set timeframe or adopts energy-efficiency measures. Staff said design and construction would proceed through normal permitting and that the current sale is structured as a straight sale rather than a redevelopment agreement; imposing new conditions would likely require remarketing and altering the listed terms. Alderman White noted staff had connected the buyer with a state energy official to discuss compliance with updated state energy code (the 2024/2024 IECC adoption referenced in staff remarks).
Some aldermen urged more background and a site history before future approvals; others said delaying the sale could risk losing the purchaser. After debate the council called the question and the sale was approved by roll call (recorded 12–0 in the transcript).
