Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Firestation Reconstruction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kokomo Board approves $551,353.87 payment for Fire Station No. 6, OKs $40,915 change order

Board of Public Works and Safety, Kokomo City · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Kokomo Board of Public Works and Safety approved pay application #5 for the Fire Station No. 6 reconstruction for $551,353.87, placed $29,018.63 in escrow for retainage, and approved change order #3 for $40,915 to cover insulation, design modifications and costs tied to an unmarked AT&T line.

The Kokomo Board of Public Works and Safety voted Jan. 14 to approve pay application number 5 for the Fire Station No. 6 reconstruction and to accept change order number 3.

Acting city engineer Carrie Stranahan recommended approval of pay application number 5 in the amount of $551,353.87, asked that $29,018.63 be placed in an escrow account for retainage, and recommended approval of change order number 3 for $40,915 to cover insulation, design modifications and an additional cost tied to an unmarked AT&T line. "I recommend the Board of Public Works and Safety approve pay application number 5 in the amount of $551,353.87," the staff recommendation stated.

The Board moved and seconded the recommendation and voted unanimously to carry the motion.

The action advances construction work that staff described as including apparatus and wall construction, structural steel fabrication, electrical rough-in, earthwork and water line installation. The change order covers insulation work, design modifications and costs associated with relocating or addressing an unmarked AT&T line, according to the staff report.

Because the Board approved placing a retainage amount in escrow, those funds will be held until project conditions for release are met; staff did not state a separate timeline for final completion during the item. The Board did not discuss changes to the project budget or funding source in detail at the Jan. 14 meeting.