Superintendent unveils FY27 budget framed as Vision 2029; committee seeks clearer town‑level impact visuals
Loading...
Summary
Superintendent presented a FY27 budget that she described as a 2.76% district spending increase focused on MTSS and tiered supports; committee members asked for Excel breakout sheets, a level‑funding scenario and clearer town‑impact visuals because town tax increases after state aid vary widely.
Superintendent Gina Piccard presented the proposed fiscal‑year 2027 budget as the first implementation year of "Vision 2029," emphasizing investments in tiered instructional supports, interventions and measures to strengthen student success across the Chariho Regional School District.
Piccard said the district's auditors reported no findings and that the proposed FY27 spending plan represents a 2.76% increase in district spending, which she described as "under inflation" for the region and aligned to strategic priorities such as multi‑tiered systems of support, alternative learners and CTE investments. "The FY27 budget marks an important milestone for the Chariho Regional School District as the first year of Vision 2029," she said.
Committee members focused on the public messaging challenge: the district's one‑page budget summary shows larger percentage increases for town-level contributions after state aid is applied, and several members said residents will see the bottom‑line town number and not the district‑level percentage. Finance staff explained that the bottom line on the committee's one‑page sheet includes state aid that flows through towns, which produces different town impacts depending on local allocations and fund balances. One member asked staff to "draw it in crayon"—a request for simple, clear visuals showing what each town’s tax bill change would look like.
The committee requested several follow‑ups before the omnibus and budget‑workshop meetings: an Excel version of the one‑page summary and the 49‑page budget book, a level‑funding scenario showing what a 0% increase would look like, a breakdown of the "four big buckets" (staffing/benefits/operations/capital) as percentages, details on deferred capital and furniture cuts, and a clear per‑town illustration of how state aid and fund balance affect local tax‑bill impacts.
The building‑committee update earlier in the meeting also reported savings from prior bond projects ($2,300,000 spent on completed projects with $760,000 in savings reported), which finance noted as part of the fiscal picture.
What comes next: staff will produce the requested spreadsheets and scenarios for review at upcoming workshops and the omnibus meeting; committee members asked for clearer communications materials to explain district vs. town impacts before public outreach related to the bond or budget vote.
