Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Resident alleges Water's Edge reconsideration violated procedure; city attorney says council member service on CPWS board required by state law
Summary
A county resident told council the December re-vote on the Water's Edge PUD was procedurally improper and may have violated the Open Meetings Act; the city attorney responded that Tennessee Code Annotated 7-52-108 requires a council member to serve on the Board of Public Utilities and said he found no conflict of interest for Councilman Marshall.
A member of the public told the City of Columbia council that the council27s second vote on the Water's Edge preliminary PUD raised legal and procedural concerns.
Dustin Kittle, a county resident who spoke during the study session, said he delivered a notice letter to the council alleging procedural deficiencies tied to the Water's Edge reconsideration. "A motion for reconsideration can only be made during that same meeting," he said, and "the problem with that is that's a violation of…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
