Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident questions nonprofit role, city says fundraising aims to limit taxpayer cost
Summary
A resident asked why a nonprofit was formed to fund Service and Sacrifice Park while the city retains ownership, and urged better collaboration; city officials said the nonprofit’s aim is to raise funds so the project imposes little or no tax impact and the attorney is clarifying roles to improve cooperation.
Connie Hiedamok asked the council why a nonprofit had been created to support the Service and Sacrifice Park when other city parks do not have nonprofit partners and why the nonprofit and city appear unable to collaborate while the park remains city-owned.
“I am very confused regarding our Service And Sacrifice Park and why the city and the nonprofit don't seem to be able to work collaboratively on this park,” Hiedamok said, and asked three specific questions about the nonprofit’s role, ownership status, and why neighboring communities manage similar projects successfully.
A city official responded that the nonprofit’s purpose is to lead fundraising so the city and its taxpayers have little or no financial burden; veterans and first-responder groups have rallied behind the vision. The official acknowledged political and personality differences have complicated progress and said the city attorney is assisting to clarify roles and find a path to cooperation.
Speakers during open discussion also raised concerns about grant funds that had been promised for local projects, the status of a local fire hydrant and water main work, and frustrations with delays. Council members said staff would continue working with stakeholders and follow up.
Next steps: staff and the city attorney will continue to engage with the nonprofit and stakeholders to clarify roles and advance the project; no formal action was taken at the meeting.
