Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Speakers accuse city staff of misleading survey materials in Big Branch Greenway debate
Summary
Speakers at public comment accused city staff of overstating historical prioritization of the Big Branch Greenway connector, said advisory board members voted against routing through Anderson Forest, and urged the council to consider lower‑cost street‑side alternatives.
Two public commenters told the council they believe the city has mischaracterized public input and historical planning documents related to the proposed Big Branch Greenway connector.
Elizabeth Scott asserted that staff claims the connector appeared as a priority in the 1976 and 1989 greenway master plans are false and pointed out an easement that she said forbids greenway…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
