Baseball boosters propose donor‑funded roof for batting cage; board to consider approval next meeting
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
SubscribeSummary
The Williamston baseball boosters, led by Marian Palmer and head coach Ryan Orr, proposed a donor‑funded roof over the existing batting cage (estimated $25,000–$30,000) that they say would cost the district nothing upfront; boosters requested formal approval be placed on the next meeting agenda so construction can occur before the 2026 season opener.
Marian Palmer, president of the Williamston baseball boosters, presented a community‑funded plan to roof the district’s outdoor batting cage and upgrade lighting, saying the project would be turnkey with no upfront cost to Williamston Community Schools.
Palmer said the project is 100% booster funded and backed by local business donations; she described a design with treated support posts, shatter‑resistant lighting and a sided‑open roof to reduce ventilation and fire‑egress costs. The boosters reported total donation value exceeding $25,000 and said they currently have over $35,000 earmarked to cover the proposed $25,000–$30,000 installation, while administration confirmed facilities review and sponsor recognition plans.
Head coach Ryan Orr described safety and scheduling benefits: a roof and lighting would reduce weather‑related cancellations, protect equipment (pitching machines, mats, netting) and allow teams to practice later into the evening during Michigan spring conditions. Palmer said Title IX considerations were reviewed and counsel approved a proposed usage agreement that includes sharing access with softball and youth sports.
Board members asked technical and logistical questions (netting material, bleacher sightlines, contractor approvals, start date and duration). Superintendent Adam and facilities staff said plans and approvals have been reviewed and recommended placing the item on the next meeting agenda for formal action; board members agreed to allow time for additional questions before scheduling approval.
No formal board approval was recorded at this meeting; boosters requested the board put the item on the next agenda so work could start in time for spring events if approved.
