Board continues 4 South Street seven-unit condo application after presentation and neighbor concerns

Quincy Planning Board · January 12, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Developers presented a four-story, seven-unit residential project at 4 South Street with ground-level parking and stormwater controls; the applicant said plans meet dimensional requirements. Neighbors raised concerns about retaining-wall complaints and ownership changes; the board continued the case to March 11.

Quincy Planning Board members heard a site plan review for 4 South Street on Jan. 14, where the applicant described a four-story, 44-foot residential building with seven units and 16 parking spaces over a roughly 14,054-square-foot lot. The board continued the case to March 11 to allow the applicant to address outstanding technical and ownership questions.

Attorney Rob Fleming said the applicant (Quincy four-six South, LLC) does not intend to seek dimensional relief and that the design meets City of Quincy zoning requirements. Architect Brian Donahue detailed unit layouts (four two-bedroom units and three one-bedroom units), removal of a previously proposed fifth-floor amenity, exterior materials and screening, and a 25-foot setback. Civil engineer Eric Brannese described pervious-paver parking, an 8-inch perforated pipe under the pavers for infiltration, and roughly 6,100 square feet of new landscaped area to increase green space on a lot that had been nearly entirely paved.

Why it matters: A nearby resident, Jenny McNeil, testified there is an open Inspectional Services Department complaint related to a failing retaining wall and foundation problems at a neighboring development; she urged the board to ensure prior issues are addressed before allowing a new, adjacent project to proceed. Planning staff said abutters were notified per Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 40A and that ISD and planning staff are monitoring complaints; staff recommended continuance to allow time for follow-up.

What was decided: The board voted to continue the 4 South Street hearing to March 11 so the applicant can provide additional detail (including transformer location and landscape/planting plans) and coordinate with peer-review comments from city engineers.

Next steps: Applicant to supply updated site plans showing transformer placement, landscaping screening, and confirmation of underground electrical routing, and to coordinate with city peer-review engineers prior to the next hearing.