Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appeals court considers enforceability of open-ended extension clause in land sale dispute

Judicial - Appeals Court Oral Arguments · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The parties disputed whether a signed terms-of-agreement satisfied the statute of frauds and whether the clause "you will grant me any extensions that I request" creates an unenforceable, open-ended option; counsel urged remand or affirmation.

BOSTON — In O'Brien v. Nabadowski, argued Jan. 14, 2026, the appeals court heard whether a signed terms-of-agreement (TOA) for a multi-parcel farm sale satisfied the statute of frauds and how to interpret a clause allowing extensions.

Appellant counsel Don Bornstein summarized the transaction: a $1.2 million purchase price allocated as $400,000 per two parcels to one side and $400,000 for the remaining lot after wetlands cleanup,…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans