Brownsville approves Midtown Entertainment District rules after heated debate; owners warn of costs
Loading...
Summary
Commissioners approved on first reading a Midtown Entertainment District ordinance requiring enhanced security, lighting, cameras, ID checks and penalties for late-night alcohol-driven venues after hours of public testimony from bar owners, residents and police. Staff will return with boundary refinements and additional public hearings.
The City Commission on Tuesday approved on first reading a new ordinance creating a Midtown Entertainment District and new rules for late-night alcohol-serving establishments in parts of Brownsville, a move officials said is aimed at reducing fights, underage drinking and serious violence in a cluster of nightlife venues.
The ordinance, as presented by staff, would define bar/drinking establishments and require measures that include electronic ID verification, enhanced lighting and surveillance cameras, retained recordings for 14 days, and a ban on BYOB during restricted hours in public spaces. It also requires operators to maintain security staffing at specified ratios during restricted hours (the draft set one licensed security officer per 75 occupants) and allows civil enforcement and fines for noncompliance. City staff described the proposal as the first step in a two-step approach that will also include Unified Development Code amendments to require specific-use permits for new bars.
Brownsville Police and the fire chief urged action after a series of fights and at least one stabbing tied to a concentrated nightlife area. Police command staff told commissioners that increased police presence has a measurable effect on crowd control and that the department’s overtime posture during those weekend operations costs the city approximately $2,800 per night in the current response model.
Bar owners and plaza operators testified they have invested in cameras, lighting and off-duty officers and said a new strict security mandate could be financially crippling. "We went from selling $1.6 million a year to selling $450,000 last year by changing our demographic," said Rick Maso/Massell, a longtime local bar owner who said mandated security costs could reach tens of thousands per year per business. Others said they already hire commissioned constables and use ID-checking procedures and asked for a targeted rather than citywide approach.
After extended discussion the commission amended the draft to take a tiered approach: keeping electronic ID verification and other baseline operational requirements broadly, while making the highest-cost staffing requirement (commissioned or commissioned-security officers on site) trigger-driven. Under the amendment, a plaza or venue that accumulates repeated incidents (a proposed two-strike trigger was discussed) would be required to provide commissioned/security staffing until the plaza is cleared. Commissioners asked staff to refine the ordinance language, revisit the map boundaries and bring additional public hearings for Downtown and other commercial corridors.
The commission voted to approve the ordinance as amended on first reading and directed staff to return with the changes for final reading. Commissioners and staff said they will pursue UDC amendments and other zoning tools in the coming months to address new establishments and to consider remedies for existing nonconforming businesses.
