Forney ISD reviews TASB policy update 126 with major legislative changes

Forney ISD Board of Trustees · January 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District staff presented TASB Policy Update 126 — described as the largest update — which implements recent legislative changes affecting meeting posting timelines, contractor restrictions tied to Senate Bill 12, a new AI policy per House Bill 1500, conflict-of-interest rules under HB 3372, and other human-resources and student-safety provisions.

Forney ISD’s chief of staff, Stormy Lamont, presented an overview of TASB Policy Update 126 as a first reading, describing it as the largest update the district has received. Lamont highlighted key recommended local policy revisions prompted by recent state legislation.

Notable changes Lamont described include: board-meeting rules (minutes must show how each member voted; public notices must be posted 72 hours before the day of the meeting); contractual limits tied to Senate Bill 12 restricting contractors from engaging in certain instructional activities; a new local artificial-intelligence policy aligning with House Bill 1500 and requiring training for employees; revised conflict-of-interest language and limits on administrator moonlighting tied to House Bill 3372; accelerated timelines for reporting child abuse and neglect from 48 to 24 hours; lesson-plan disclosure requirements; and updates to grading and parent-conference expectations.

Lamont emphasized the district has already taken actions to comply with several requirements (for example, posting syllabi and establishing parent-rights links) and said staff will return the recommended local-policy items for inclusion on the consent agenda in January. Board members asked clarifying questions about the posting-time change for meeting notices (moving posting to 72 hours before the day of the meeting rather than 72 hours before the meeting start time). No vote was taken — the item was presented as a first reading.