McAllen ISD unveils $335 million bond framework, describes voter information and timetable
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
District consultants and bond counsel presented a $335 million package of facility projects — including CTE expansions, high‑school campus refreshes and deferred maintenance — and reviewed ballot language, voter‑information requirements and an outreach timeline ahead of a May election.
McAllen, Texas — McAllen ISD staff and consultants on Jan. 13 presented trustees with a proposed $335 million bond program and a timetable for community engagement and the possible May 2 bond election.
Pfluger Architects and the facilities advisory committee presented a project framework that grouped priorities into academic modernizations, safety and security, learning‑beyond‑the‑classroom (fine arts), district equity and deferred maintenance. Architect Josh Sawyer summarized high‑level price tags developed with the committee: “CTE expansions at the high schools — $39,490,000; cafeteria modernizations — $33,050,000; fine arts modernizations — $35,000,000; a campus refresh at the high schools — $45,150,000,” Sawyer said. The firm’s initial compilation of districtwide priorities totalled about $335,000,000.
Bond counsel Matt Lee reviewed sample ballot language and the voter‑information document that state law requires. He cautioned that Texas statutes require a property‑tax disclosure statement to appear on the ballot even if the district does not anticipate a tax‑rate increase. “That statement has to be there no matter what,” Lee told trustees, adding that districts commonly include explanatory materials for voters to clarify whether the district expects to issue bonds while keeping the interest and sinking (I&S) tax rate unchanged.
Consultants described a public engagement plan that includes community meetings in March and April, voter education materials, and the option to issue bond proceeds in tranches to reduce near‑term tax‑rate pressure. Board members discussed whether to present the projects as a single proposition or separate propositions on the ballot; counsel advised both approaches are legally permissible and recommended the district provide clear voter information.
Administration said staff will return with a finalized project list and proposed order for board consideration at upcoming meetings; the board did not take a final bond action on Jan. 13.