Middleton trustees debate levy size, possible cuts and timeline for a May ballot

Middleton School District Board of Trustees · January 13, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members and staff weighed options for a spring levy: keep a proposed $2.476M request to maintain staffing and security officers, revert to a $1.5M ask that would require cuts, or choose a middle option near $2M. Staff will return in February with scenario comparisons for a March ballot deadline.

District business staff told trustees the primary drivers for a higher levy request are device replacements (post-COVID Chromebook cycles), security staffing (resource officers and campus security), and curriculum/textbook renewal cycles.

Staff described three options for the board to consider before a March deadline to place the levy on the May ballot: keep the previously proposed $2.476 million (maintains staffing levels and adds two additional security officers), revert to $1.5 million (would reduce personnel and services, including one teaching position and curriculum purchases), or adopt a middle option around $2.0 million that would require targeted adjustments (for example, reducing building maintenance allocations or delaying certain curriculum purchases).

Why it matters: staff said a lower levy will force reductions that affect classrooms, transportation and extracurricular activities, and noted that building-maintenance funds from modernization grants cannot be used for routine repairs. Trustees pressed for detail on likely program impacts (transportation, pay-to-play fees, curriculum adoptions) and asked for neighborhood outreach to better gauge support in the district’s eastern areas where prior bond/levy approval levels were low.

Next steps: staff agreed to prepare three concrete scenarios for the February board meeting, including estimated service and personnel impacts, and to run a targeted survey of eastern-district voters. The board discussed the need to finalize ballot language in March to appear on the May ballot.