Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Criminal Justice Information Authority offers step-by-step guidance on program narratives for grant applicants

December 22, 2025 | Criminal Justice Information Authority, Illinois, C, Boards and Commissions, Executive, Illinois


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Criminal Justice Information Authority offers step-by-step guidance on program narratives for grant applicants
The Criminal Justice Information Authority, Illinois, provided detailed guidance on writing program narratives for grant applications, saying that a clear narrative helps reviewers understand a project’s purpose, implementation and expected outcomes. The presenter said the narrative should explain the problem, the goals, who will be served and how services will be delivered.

The presenter said the program summary is often the first section reviewers read and should answer three basic questions: "What are you doing? Who are you serving? And how will you deliver those services?" That framing, the presenter said, helps reviewers unfamiliar with an organization quickly evaluate fit and impact.

Presenters urged applicants to support statements of need with data and research, and to balance community challenges with existing assets. "Show that your insights are based on direct knowledge, not guesses," the presenter said, advising inclusion of cultural or historical context where relevant.

On implementation planning, the presenter described the schedule as a roadmap: list tasks, assign them to staff positions (titles, not personal names), set realistic deadlines, and highlight milestones and deliverables that will demonstrate progress. The session emphasized aligning staffing entries with the budget and naming a grant compliance contact responsible for reporting and adherence to ICJA requirements.

The session also covered performance measurement. The presenter distinguished process measures (activities and outputs) from outcome measures (changes achieved) and recommended that applicants define what success looks like, choose measurable indicators, set time frames, and describe data collection and reporting methods.

As a closing note, the presenter warned of common pitfalls—vague problem statements, insufficient supporting evidence, incomplete implementation plans, or poorly defined performance measures—and encouraged applicants to be concrete, avoid jargon, and "think like a reviewer" when drafting narratives.

The presenter closed by thanking attendees and wishing them success in preparing narratives for their applications.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Illinois articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI