Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Climate Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House overrides veto on climate-cost study after partisan back-and-forth
Summary
House Bill 128, directing a study of the total assessed cost of greenhouse gas emissions, was overridden 98-37 following a lengthy debate in which members disagreed over the state's ability to affect climate outcomes and the study’s value to policy decisions.
Annapolis — The Maryland House of Delegates voted 98-37 on Dec. 16 to override the governor’s veto of House Bill 128, a measure to study the total assessed cost of greenhouse gas emissions and related adaptation and mitigation expenses.
Proponents said quantifying costs would help the state make informed decisions about mitigation and adaptation, calling the study a tool for future policy. One delegate urged colleagues that the bill is "simply a study" to obtain better data on costs and to engage agencies like the Maryland Energy Administration and the comptroller’s office.
Opponents argued such a study is symbolic, expensive and may have limited practical effect on global climate trends. A delegate questioned Maryland’s relative impact and warned that pursuing aggressive measures could hurt affordability and jobs. “We don't really make a whole heck of a lot of difference,” an opponent said, arguing that costs could outweigh benefits.
After extended floor debate about the state's role, legal ideas in earlier drafts (including possible litigation or taxation frameworks) and public polling priorities, the House completed a roll-call: 98 yes, 37 no. The clerk recorded the result and sent the message to the Senate.
Next steps: The bill requires the authorized study; committees will determine technical scope and reporting requirements.
