Industry urges CPUC to allow meter-socket adapters for multifamily housing

California Public Utilities Commission · January 13, 2026

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Manufacturers and affordable-housing advocates told CPUC staff that excluding multifamily from Rule 31 will block electrification for large swaths of residents; IOU staff said multi-socket panels pose equity and technical challenges that remain unresolved.

Manufacturers, installers and affordable-housing advocates urged the California Public Utilities Commission to create a clear pathway for meter socket adapters (MSAs) in multifamily buildings, saying the exclusion in draft Rule 31 language risks blocking electrification for renters and low-income residents.

A speaker from Power Tree argued multifamily housing constitutes a large share of the state’s housing stock and that excluding multifamily from Rule 31 undermines state electrification and housing affordability goals. The presenter said multifamily makes up roughly “42% of the population” while historically receiving “less than 1%” of solar installations, and recounted a San Francisco project that faced more than $500,000 in upgrade costs and a two-to-four year delay after utilities required utility-side upgrades instead of behind-the-meter solutions.

PG&E’s Michelle responded that multi-socket panels were specifically excluded because many such properties have mixed ownership or staggered adoption timing that could create a first-mover advantage and inequitable outcomes. She said the utility has not yet found an equitable, scalable solution for condo or tenant-in-common situations where meters abut each other and communications cabling or other physical constraints complicate installations.

Speakers including an affordable-housing developer and a nonprofit argued the commission should remove administrative and technical barriers to multifamily MSAs and allow controlled third-party installation pilots or authorized installers. Stakeholders also recommended exploring alternatives such as a separate generation meter for multifamily projects, but manufacturers said centralized meters can trigger costly upgrade analyses that make projects infeasible.

The workshop produced no decision on multifamily eligibility; CPUC staff and IOU representatives said they would continue technical engagement and address stakeholder questions in upcoming filings.