Citizen Portal

Board places $150,000 Title I reallocation on consent; public speakers press for better staff pay and supports

Virginia Beach City Public Schools School Board · January 14, 2026
Article hero
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

VDOE guidance allows VBCPS to apply for just over $150,000 in FY2024 Title I reallocation funds restricted to equitable services for private‑school students; public commenters urged the board to prioritize competitive pay and supports for teachers and staff.

The board placed the federal FY2024 Title I, Part A bypass reallocation application on the consent agenda and approved it as part of the consent package.

Laura Silverman, director of Title I programs, told the board that VBCPS "will receive just over $150,000 in additional funding," and that the funds are restricted to providing equitable Title I services to participating private‑school students this school year; VDOE guidance requires the funds be encumbered by Sept. 30, 2026 and reimbursed by Nov. 15, 2026. The application requires superintendent and school board approval and was included on the consent agenda, which passed 11–0.

Separately during public comment, multiple speakers raised staffing and budget concerns. Heather Sipe, president of the Virginia Beach Education Association, urged the board to "value and invest in staff," saying the division ranks poorly on compensation: "Virginia Beach is dead last when it comes to teachers and education support professionals' wages," she said, and called on the board to scrutinize budget line items and prioritize staff retention and recruitment.

Other public commentators suggested practical student resources: a student speaker proposed making low‑cost "know your rights" immigration cards available in high school counseling offices; another student proposed a mobile kitchen program to deliver culinary training to students with disabilities. Those ideas were presented as informational public comments; no formal motions were made at the meeting on them.