Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Temporary Fencing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council member questions $400,000 fencing contract; interim parks director says cost is 3-year rental estimate
Summary
Council Member Taylor pressed staff on item 4c, a fencing and gate rental contract with an estimated $400,000 total; Interim Director Andrea Alacotte said the amount covers three years (about $120,000 annually), is rental through a contractor, and resulted from a competitive bid process.
Get email alerts on the Procurement Temporary Fencing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discussion at a Mesa City Council study session on Jan. 12 focused on item 4c, a multi-year procurement for temporary fencing, gates, repair, and rental supplies for Parks & Recreation and Facility Management.
Council Member Taylor expressed concern about the potential $400,000 cost, saying, “I'm struggling to understand the temporary fencing costing $400,000 potentially annually, and I did not see pricing to justify that.”
Andrea Alacotte, interim parks, recreation and community facilities director, explained the pricing: “The $400,000 is for 3 years, and the justification for that cost in an annual basis, we purchase about a 120,000 annually. So for the 3 years, and then we allow a little bit of a room for a buffer in case there's any unanticipated projects.” She said the fencing is rented from a contractor (not purchased) and the contract was awarded through a competitive bid process.
Alacotte noted the fencing is used for securing construction projects, creating temporary dog-park areas during maintenance, and containing areas while playground equipment is repaired. Council members thanked staff for the clarification; no formal vote on the renewal was recorded at the study session.
Council Member Taylor's questions prompted staff to confirm rental vs. purchase, budget timing, and that the dollar figure represented a multi-year total rather than an annual line item.
No amendments or final direction were made during the study session; the item remains on the council agenda for a subsequent regular meeting where members can vote.

