Administrators briefed the board on how the district pays for contracted pupil transportation and a contract provision that links future term extensions to the contractor’s electrification of certain buses.

Emily, the budget presenter, said the district’s vendor’s yard includes 29 Type‑1 buses, seven Type‑2 buses and three vans for general education. The district pays a fixed per‑vehicle, per‑day rate for 5.25 hours of run time and does not invest in the contractor’s fleet; the district invests only in its own vehicles and infrastructure. The current contract’s initial term runs through June 30, 2029, and contains a provision allowing an extension (from five to ten years) if the contractor operates zero‑emission Type‑1 buses and has the appropriate charging infrastructure.

Board members debated procurement principles and whether extending agreement terms to incentivize electrification is preferable to repeated RFPs. One board member said RFPs have limits for school‑bus service given the driver onboarding cycle; administrators noted that electrification mandates and timelines vary by community and that statewide electrification requirements would likely affect only select districts on accelerated timetables.

Administrators also noted related operational work (easement clearance between bus yards and contractor offices) planned for the summer to support potential fleet transitions.

No contractual extension decision was made at the meeting; the item remains a discussion topic for future budget and procurement deliberations.