Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council declines to advance proposal to bar recent council members from city employment for one year
Summary
A council request to pursue an ethics‑code amendment prohibiting a local official from being hired by the city within one year after leaving office did not move forward after a 5–4 roll‑call vote; members debated scope, overlap with state law and fairness to future applicants.
Council member Henkel asked the City Council to pursue a future code change that would bar a local government official from obtaining employment with the City and County of Broomfield for one year after completing their term, arguing that officials should not benefit from funds or programs they approved while in office.
City Attorney Rogers and other staff noted existing state statute provisions that apply in narrower circumstances and explained the municipality can adopt its own code of ethics. Council members asked whether the restriction should be limited to positions that a departing official had direct responsibility for or whether it should apply broadly.
Debate covered both public‑trust concerns and practical impacts: Council member Anderson and others said a broad one‑year bar could exclude ordinary roles (for example, part‑time rec‑center instructors) and could discourage candidates or short‑term employment; supporters said it would increase transparency and public trust. Council member Ward and other members suggested staff study narrower options.
Council conducted a roll‑call vote on whether to forward the request as a future action (a step that would direct staff to study and return with draft language). The result was 5 yes, 4 no; because the vote failed to meet the threshold to move forward, the council did not direct staff to pursue the change at this time.
