Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Restorative justice director explains pretrial transfer, program fees and drug-screening cost increases

January 16, 2026 | Belknap County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Restorative justice director explains pretrial transfer, program fees and drug-screening cost increases
Patricia Thompson, identified in the meeting as director of the county's supervision services, briefed commissioners on changes after pretrial services moved from the jail into restorative justice supervision and answered detailed budget questions.

Thompson said part-time wage increases reflected the transfer of pretrial staff into her program and noted that wage money "was supposed to come with her" in one personnel case. She described a modest across-the-board increase to reflect merit and cost-of-living adjustments.

On program fees, Thompson said, "Program fees are fees that are collected, for supervision of adult diversion, misdemeanor, and felony cases. So if you have a misdemeanor diversion case, the fee is $400. If you have a felony diversion case, it's $500. We do not charge juveniles program fees because it's covered in the grant that we get." She added that courts had sometimes waived fees in the past and that she has asked stakeholders "please don't do that" to preserve flexibility for a sliding-scale approach when people cannot pay.

Thompson also addressed a jump in drug-screening costs. She said drug screens were underused before the transfer; when she assumed responsibility the prior kits had expired and had to be replaced quickly, and with pretrial responsibilities the caseload grew (she cited "almost 200 inmates" connected to pretrial), explaining why the drug-screening line rose.

She confirmed the department received a grant this year that was accepted by the commissioners and described that as a partial offset for program activities, but she emphasized that program fees are not a primary revenue source and should be viewed as a programmatic tool to teach budgeting and responsibility.

The commission discussed reducing a sick-time incentive estimate (from $1,000 to a suggested $500) and asked clarifying questions about telecommunications vendor changes and how certain costs were moved between budget lines. No formal vote or ordinance related to Thompson's items was recorded in the transcript excerpt.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI